The Power of a 14-24mm lens
A personal and experience-driven reflection on what a 14–24mm lens truly enables in landscape and astrophotography, how it challenges composition and creative decision-making, where its limitations become part of the process, and how to honestly decide whether this ultra wide-angle lens belongs in your photography kit.
We will take a deeper look into my NIKKOR 14-24mm f/2.8 S lens.
Nicolas Jægergaard
Why a 14–24mm Matters
Some lenses make your life easier.
Others make you a better photographer.
A 14–24mm belongs to the second category.
I’ve been using my NIKKOR 14–24mm f/2.8 S for more than five years now, and it has followed me on countless trips. It’s not a lens that lives on my camera by default, but it always lives in my bag. And there are certain situations where I wouldn’t even consider leaving without it.
This isn’t a collaboration or a brand endorsement. These are simply my honest thoughts after years of real-world use – the good, the challenging, and the moments this lens made possible.
Not an Everyday Lens – and That’s the Point
A 14–24mm isn’t a casual walk-around lens. I don’t mount it just because I can. I choose it intentionally, when the location calls for it.
But when it does call for it, nothing else really replaces it.
If I’m heading out for astrophotography – Milky Way or aurora – this lens goes on from the start. I’ve tried other wide and fast lenses over the years, including f/1.8 options. On paper, they should be better. In reality, they often weren’t.
I experienced heavy vignetting and soft stars toward the corners. With the 14–24mm f/2.8, the stars stay sharp across the frame, and the image quality feels far more consistent. Yes, f/2.8 means slightly higher ISO – but with modern sensors and denoising tools, that trade-off is more than worth it.
Some shots simply wouldn’t exist in my archive without this lens.
What 14mm Really Gives You
The difference between 24mm and 14mm might not sound dramatic on paper. In the real world, it absolutely is.
At 14mm, the scene opens up. You’re no longer just photographing what’s in front of you – you’re photographing where you are. The landscape becomes part of the story.
This is where the lens truly shines for me:
Big, open landscapes
Strong foreground elements
Tight spaces where stepping back isn’t an option
I love images built in three layers – foreground, middle ground and background. When it works, it pulls the viewer straight into the scene. Wide angle makes that possible, but it also makes it harder. Composition becomes critical. A few centimeters left or right, up or down, can completely change the image.
It’s challenging. I still get it wrong. Often.
But when it works, it’s incredibly rewarding.








Calm or Dramatic – It Can Be Both
Wide-angle photography has an interesting duality.
It can be calm, spacious and quiet – or dramatic, powerful and overwhelming. The lens doesn’t decide that. You do. Your composition does.
That’s why I keep coming back to the 14–24mm. It forces me to slow down. To think. To move the camera deliberately and work the scene instead of just zooming in.
In that way, it has shaped how I photograph.
Where It Clearly Wins
There are situations where my 24–70mm simply can’t compete:
Astrophotography – more sky, more landscape, better star performance
Epic landscapes – especially when foreground matters
Tight locations – waterfalls, caves, narrow spaces
A great example is photographing places like Gljúfrabúi in Iceland. With a longer lens, you simply don’t get the full story. At 14mm, you do.
The Honest Downsides
A 14–24mm is not perfect – and it shouldn’t be sold as such.
There have been many moments where I wished I could zoom in just a bit more. When something is far away, this lens gives you no options. Even with a 45MP camera, cropping only gets you so far.
It’s also a super wide-angle lens. That means distortion is real, and careless compositions fall apart quickly.
And then there’s filters.
Because the front element protrudes, I can’t mount filters directly. To use ND filters, I’d need a special holder and 112mm filters – which aren’t cheap. I often use this lens for waterfalls and would love slower shutter speeds, so yes… that’s on me. I should probably just buy the filter already.
Is a 14–24mm for You?
This lens is for you if:
You love wide-angle landscapes
You enjoy working with strong foregrounds
You want to challenge your composition skills
You shoot astro, aurora or dramatic scenery
It might not be for you if:
You mainly do point-and-shoot photography
You want one lens to do everything
You rarely photograph landscapes or environments
A 14–24mm isn’t about convenience. It’s about intention.
Final thoughts
The 14–24mm isn’t the most used lens in my bag – but it’s one of the most important.
It has helped me capture images I simply couldn’t make otherwise. It has challenged me creatively, forced me to slow down, and rewarded patience and precision.
If you’re curious about wide-angle photography and ready to accept the challenge that comes with it, a 14–24mm might just change how you see landscapes.
It certainly changed how I do.
Disclaimer:
This blog post was written with the assistance of AI technology to help organize and enhance my ideas and experiences.
All content is based on my personal thoughts and ideas.